Ethereum pools: Understand double consumption and reject transactions
When it comes to saving and transferring values in the Ethereum network, pool fees play a key role in maintaining blockchain integrity. One of the most populated questions in the Ethereum ecosystem is a double consumption that occurs when the attacker manipulates several transactions in order to own the same property or data.
Understanding the double consumption fees
Double consumption fees relate to the cost of execution of two conflict -rich transactions that aim to dissolve the differences of opinion on the property of a certain property or data. In the case of Ethereum, this often leads to a situation in which the attacker successfully needs a certain contract or a certain data, which leads to lost means of the original owner.
Modified swimming pools with reduced fees
In order to relieve these problems, some pools have developed a modified version of the Bitcoin customer who use different rules to select transactions that are included in the block. These changes aim to reduce the fees associated with the double consumption and rejection of transactions. However, the effectiveness of such poold design varies greatly, and their effects on the overall efficiency of the network are still unclear.
Pools that have priority rejection of transaction
One of the remarkable examples is the “DSR)” DSR), which developed several swimming pools, including the binans of the pools and the Huobi pools. By introducing a modified transaction selection process, DSR wants to reject double consumption transactions and ensure that only a legitimate transaction is contained in each block.
However, it is important to note that these poold designs are not without controversy. Some critics claim that the DSR protocol is tortured by technical problems such as a reduced block size and an increased congestion, which can have a negative impact on network performance.
Pools that have priority to optimize compensation
Other pools have developed more direct strategies for optimizing the fees and concentrated on reducing the fees associated with the rejection of transactions and not explicitly facilitating the risk of double wear. For example, the “Optimize” protocol is used by the modified algorithm of the consensus to reduce congestion and improve the overall permeability.
Diploma
Although some poold designs have double consumption fees than other problems such as improved network performance or increased security against priority, the long -term effects of these strategies remain uncertain. While the Ethereum ecosystem is developing, it is crucial for developers and pool operators to accompany the effects of their design decisions on the wider network.
Ultimately, every pool that claims to offer competitive fees may not necessarily be the best choice for users who strive for optimal performance. To ensure that you get the best out of experience in the pool, you should examine every option thoroughly and weigh the compromises between different design philosophy before making a decision.
Sources:
- “Double -Consuming Promotion Protocol” (Github)
- DSR protocol “Huobi Pools” (Huobi WhitePaper)
- “Binance Pools” optimize the protocol “(Binance WhitePaper)
Note: The above -mentioned article only serves for informative purposes and should not be regarded as investment advice. Always carry out your research before making financial decisions.
